Legal Opinion

Melgard v. Moscow Idaho Seed Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1952No. 7922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

The plaintiffs (appellants) brought this action to recover upon four promissory notes given by the defendant (respondent) for unpaid wages due W. R. Melgard for services to the defendant as its general manager. The defendant admits its liability upon the notes. By counterclaim it sought and obtained judgment against the plaintiffs for a loss, in excess of the amount due on the notes, occasioned to it by a breach of duty on the part of Melgard while acting as a director and general manager of the defendant.

The defendant was established and its business carried on for many years…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. Lutherland, Inc. v. DahlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Horne v. HolleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. Connelly v. Special Road & Bridge District No. 5Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Diedrick v. HelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schildberg Rock Products Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Applications of Intermountain Gas CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Knutsen v. FrushourIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. J. D. ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Atlas Coal Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API