Legal Opinion
Marvel Specialty Company, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Bell Hosiery Hills, Inc., and Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 3, 1964No. 9112PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOREMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement. The District Court found the patent valid and infringed by one accused device but not infringed by another. Both parties have appealed.
The patent in suit is United States patent No. 2,570,637, entitled “Method of and Apparatus for Mending Hosiery” issued to Merle M. Brown in October of 1951 and relates to a method and machine for repairing “pulled threads” in knitted fabrics. However, at the beginning of the trial the sole method claim was disclaimed and only the apparatus claims are in issue here.
Plaintiff, Marvel Specialty…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Saco-Lowell Shops v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Oliver F. Marston v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc., Oliver F. Marston v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Diamond International Corporation v. WalterhoeferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Marvel Specialty Company, Inc. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc., and Stanford Marley Distributing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.