Legal Opinion
Marvel Specialty Company, Inc. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc., and Stanford Marley Distributing Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1967No. 11150_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
In Marvel Specialty Company v. Bell Hosiery H[M]ills, Inc., 330 F.2d 164 (4 Cir. 1964), we held U. S. Patent No. 2,570,637, relating to a method and machine for repairing “pulled threads” in knitted fabrics, valid; and, at the instance of the owner of the patent which manufactured a commercial machine called the “Marvel” mender, we held that the “Miracle” and “Mend-More” machines manufactured by Stanford Marley Distributing Co., Inc. (“Stanford”), and used by Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc. (“Bell”), infringed the patent. We remanded the case to the district court for an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Seymour v. McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Marvel Specialty Company, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Bell Hosiery Hills, Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Electric Pipe Line, Inc. v. Fluid Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw Feeders, Inc., and Cross-Appellees v. Carrier Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Polaroid Corp. v. OffermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Milgo Electronic Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. United Business Communications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.