State v. M.D.T.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
This case arises from respondent M.D.T.’s petition to expunge records relating to her aggravated forgery conviction. The district court granted M.D.T.’s request and ordered “[a]ll official records” to “be sealed and their existence ... be disclosed only by court order.” The court of appeals affirmed the district court. State v. M.D.T., 815 N.W.2d 628 (Minn.App.2012). Because we conclude that the district court did not have inherent authority to expunge M.D.T.’s records held in the executive branch, we reverse that part of the court of appeals’ decision.
On February…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Loder v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. C. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State ex rel. Veskrna v. SteelNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Rushmore Shadows, LLC v. Pennington County Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In re Craig E. Cascarano, State of Minnesota v. Michael Demond Rashaun MasonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.