Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
The only issue presented by this case turns on the finality of a judgment for purposes of appeal, a subject on which the volume of judicial writing already is formidable. The Court of Appeals resolved against finality of the decree in question, saying, however, that it did so against the unanimous conviction of the court as constituted but in deference to a precedent established by a differently constituted court of the same Circuit. 173 F. 2d 738. Because of this intracircuit conflict, we made a limited grant of certiorari. 338 U. S. 811. That we cannot devise a form of words that will…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hill v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Clark v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by319 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
314 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.