Legal Opinion
William McNabola v. Chicago Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 24, 1993No. 92-1133PublishedCited by 364 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
William McNabola maintains that the Chicago Transit Authority (the “CTA”) discriminated against him on account of his race when it terminated his relationship with the CTA. The jury found that the CTA’s Board of Directors had a custom or policy of terminating whites similarly situated to McNabola and that McNabola had been terminated pursuant to that custom or policy. The jury accordingly awarded back pay and future losses, and also compensated McNabola for emotional distress. The district court, after ordering a remittitur of the jury’s damage verdict,…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by364 opinions
- David Brown v. Timothy BudzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Manzer v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Bissessur v. Indiana University Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Donald McCormick v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
359 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.