Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Guttman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 8, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Lincoln Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle —

Affirming.

The appellees, W. M. Guttman, N. T. Guttman, and Christine Guttman, recovered in this action against the appellant, the Lousiville & Nashville B. B. Co., a verdict and judgment for $450.00 in damages, resulting from the destruction hy fire of their residence and some of their household property therein, caused, as alleged, by the negligence of appellant in not having its railroad engine properly equipped' and by the negligent handling of same.

Appellant asks a reversal of the judgment on the grounds:

First: That the trial court erred in refusing to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Ry. v. HicklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Kentucky Central Railroad v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  3. Oswald v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  4. L. & N. R. R. v. EckmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. ScheibleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API