Legal Opinion

L. & N. R. R. v. Eckman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 3, 1910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

CASE 44. — ACTION BY B. F. ECKMAN AGAINST THE LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY.— Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court, Common Law and Equity Division. M. L. ELarbeson, Judge. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

— Affirming.

This is an appeal from a,judgment entered in the court below upon a verdict awarding appellee $290, for injuries to his person and the wrecking of his automobile by one of appellant’s trains, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellant’s servants. Appellant’s only contention is that its negligence was not the proximate cause of the injuries sustained by appellee, or his automobile, but that they resulted solely from his own negligence, and that the trial court erred in refusing to peremptorily instruct the jury to find for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. GasperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Setter's Admr. v. City of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gregg v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Wyseur v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Denker Transfer Co. v. PughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GuttmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API