Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Hobbs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 30, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Lee Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

F. W. Morgan resided with his family, consisting of cloven children, adjacent co the right of way of appellants, at a point between Fincastle and Torrent. The track in front of the house was on a considerable elevation. The eaves of the house were level with the roadbed. At this point there is a one per cent grade, and what is termed a double or reverse curve. A portion of the house was constructed of logs, chinked with mud, the remainder was built of planks; there were three rooms below and one above; the house was old; the roof in places cupped and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cin., N. O. & T. P. Ry Co. v. Sadieville Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GuttmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. ScheibleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lane v. HatfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  3. Stewart v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RainsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Frankfort Cincinnati Railroad Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API