Legal Opinion
State v. JAMAR D.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 10, 2011No. SC 18277PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVELEIGH, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal 1 is whether the Appellate Court, sua sponte, properly dismissed for lack of a final judgment the interlocutory appeal of the defendant, Jamar D., from an order of the trial court transferring the defendant’s case from the youthful offender docket of the Superior Court (youthful offender docket) to the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court (regular criminal docket) pursuant to General Statutes § 54-76c (b) (l). 2 The defendant claims that the trial court’s order constituted an appeal-able interlocutory order under State v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Lewis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re Juvenile Appeal (85-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. LongoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- In re Keijam T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Elias G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Town of Ledyard v. WMS Gaming, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Halladay v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Hylton v. GunterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Hylton v. GunterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014