Legal Opinion
In re Keijam T.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 4, 1992No. 14364PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issues in this appeal concern the proper standards for a trial court to employ in determining (1) probable cause for purposes of transfer from the juvenile docket to the regular criminal docket pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 46b-127, and (2) whether evidence contained in an accused’s offer of proof under General Statutes *111§ 54-46a would be sufficient to rebut an antecedent finding of probable cause. The juvenile respondent, Keijam T., appeals1 from the order of the Superior Court for juvenile matters transferring him to the regular criminal docket, based upon a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Myers v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- State v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. TrineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. MunozSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.