Halladay v. Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Page 54 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL December 7, 2021 52 DECEMBER, 2021
340 Conn. 52
Halladay v. Commissioner of Correction JOSEPH HALLADAY v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION (SC 20369) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to this court’s decision in State v. Curcio ( 191 Conn. 27), certain interlocutory orders and rulings of a trial or habeas court may be appeal- able when the order or ruling terminates a separate and distinct proceed- ing or when the order or ruling so concludes the rights of the parties that further proceedings cannot affect them. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Costanzo v. PlainfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Benvenuto v. BrookmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- State v. HargettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Strand/BRC Group, LLC v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- O'Sullivan v. HaughtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024