Legal Opinion

Pears v. Shannon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1938No. Appeal, 92PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

In this action of assumpsit, based upon a written contract, plaintiff recovered a verdict for $22,307.22; from the judgment entered thereon defendant appeals.

The contract is dated May 8,1930, and reads: “Agreement between C. I. Shannon and John P. Pears as follows : On condition that John P. Pears purchases 2,000 shares of Arkansas Gas Company — Class ‘A’ stock on his own account, and agrees to carry same for a period of three months from date, subject to C. I. Shannon’s orders to hold or sell, C. I. Shannon guarantees John P. Pears against loss if stock is sold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. MagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Dougherty v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Rosenblatt v. WeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Rosenblatt v. WeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Onofrey v. WolliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Hamil v. BashlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Hay v. Pittsburgh Lodge No. 46 Loyal Order of MooseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Kolman v. KolmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Hamil v. BashlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API