Baldwin v. Magen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
On the oral argument it was virtually conceded by defendant’s counsel that, in the view then taken, his position, that judgment should be entered in his client’s favor, was not tenable. Our further study of the record confirms this conclusion and leaves for consideration but one question: Was the construction of the contract on which suit was brought for the court or for the jury, to whose interpretation the trial judge submitted its controlling provisions? '
The writing evidenced the agreement of the parties upon the terms of plaintiff’s employment by defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- L. Straus & Sons v. WanamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Shafer v. SensemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Union Water Power Co. v. Inhabitants of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
- Foster v. Berg & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Community College v. Community College, Society of the FacultySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Vale Chemical Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Howard Jamison, Administrator of the Estate of Albert Tucker, Deceased v. A. M. Byers CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.