Legal Opinion

Hamil v. Bashline

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 321PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

The dispute between these parties has been before this court on a previous occasion: Hamil v. Bashline, 224 Pa.Super. 407, 307 A.2d 57 (1973), allocatur denied, 224 Pa.Super. xxxvi. The facts, detailed in the earlier opinion, may be briefly summarized as follows: Plaintiff-appellant’s decedent, suffering from severe chest pains, was taken to the defendant-appellee hospital. One of the doctors on duty ordered the taking of an EKG. When informed that the EKG machine had malfunctioned, the doctor ordered the use of another EKG machine and then left the hospital. Another machine was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Houston v. Canon Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Hamil v. BashlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Lambert v. SoltisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Niggel v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Gradel v. InouyeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Capan v. Divine Providence HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Robert v. ChodoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Henry v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API