Rosenblatt v. Weinman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 60, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1906, No. 1,094, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Lizzie Rosenblatt to use of Benjamin Rosenblatt v. Harry Weinman. Assumpsit for money had and received. Before Ralston, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was refusal to take off nonsuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stewart,
A nonsuit was directed in this case in the court below, and the appeal is from the refusal of the court to take it off. The facts briefly are these. In the latter part of 1899 the plaintiff advanced to the defendant $6,265 to be employed by the latter in the purchase of stock in the National Electric Company. The stock was purchased accordingly in defendant’s name. Later on plaintiff received from defendant this acknowledgment in writing signed by the defendant: “Philadelphia, Sept., 14,1899. Due to Lizzie Rosenblatt Sixty two hundred and sixty-five dollars,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walker v. TupperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Galbreath v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Town & Land Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Rosenblatt v. WeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Pears v. ShannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Carroll v. SantamarieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Burkle v. Superflow Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.