Legal Opinion

Hay v. Pittsburgh Lodge No. 46 Loyal Order of Moose

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1939No. Appeal, 232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Plaintiff sued the defendant local lodge for breach of an alleged contract of employment as manager and secretary of the lodge, and recovered a verdict of $2,075.31 in the court below.

On appeal to this court from the judgment entered on the verdict, defendant assigns as error, inter alia, the refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v. Appellant’s principal contention is that the lower court erred in not holding, as a matter of law, that appellee failed to allege or prove anything more than an employment at will, and did not show a contract for a definite period.

Appell…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Butler v. KemmererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Coffin v. LandisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  3. Seiss v. McClintic-marshall Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Weidman v. United Cigar Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Trainer v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Markson Bros. v. RedickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. SabelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Hand EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Korr v. ButzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API