Legal Opinion

Nat'l Oil Ref. & Mfg. Co. v. Producers Ref. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1915No. L.A. No. 3389PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract, by the terms of which the latter agreed to supply the former with all of the crude oil required to keep the former’s refinery running to its full capacity from January 29 to December 31, 1907. The full capacity was understood to be the capacity of this refinery on January 29th. The defendant was to sell this oil at a stipulated price, and in turn was to purchase from the plaintiff the products of the refinery, these products- being the distillates and the asphaltum residuum. This action was brought laying damages for defendant’s breach of this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McKay v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hacker Pipe & Supply Co. v. Chapman Valve Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Walpole v. Prefab Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. El Rio Oils Ltd. v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API