Legal Opinion
Capelouto v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 17, 2011No. 10-823 CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
Now pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss, which has been fully briefed and is ripe for a decision by the court. Because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the claims raised in the complaint, those claims must be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC).
BACKGROUND1
On November 30, 2010, plaintiff Dale Ca-pelouto filed a number of documents with the court, which were collectively docketed as his complaint. Athough Mr. Capelouto’s “complaint” does not set forth any substantive basis…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stanwyck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Nez Perce Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Confidential Informant 59-05071 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Driscoll v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Confidential Informant 59-05071 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.