Legal Opinion

State v. Amador

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 29, 2009No. 051237389, A135475PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction, after a trial to the court on stipulated facts, for possession of methamphetamine, former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered, as ORS 475.840 (2005), arguing that his consent to a search of his person was obtained in violation of his rights under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. We affirm.

Shortly after midnight, a Portland Police Officer saw defendant driving a car with a defective rear brake light. The officer initiated a traffic stop just as defendant pulled his car into the driveway of a residence that the officer knew, from his frequent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. AmayaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. LeinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Hagler v. Coastal Farm Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API