Legal Opinion
Nitsche v. State Security Bank of Zanesville, Ohio
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 8, 1918No. 8311PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by the State Security Bank of Zanesville, Ohio, against Louis A. Nitsche and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Nitsche brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
This action was instituted in the trial court by .the State •Security Bank of Zanesville, Ohio, as as-signee of the Cleveland Trinidad Paving Company, on a written instrument designated “Special Tax Bill” with installment coupons attached thereto, as follows:
“Special Tax Bill.
“Street Improvement District INo. 52 — A.
“This certifies that the following described real estate situated in the corporate limits of the city of Tulsa, county of Tulsa, slate of Oklahoma, to wit: Lot 3, block 3, according to Lindsey addition, said city— and the owner thereof, have been duly…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Oklahoma City v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Armstrong v. Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- City Nat. Bank of Fort Smith v. Incorporated Town of KiowaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Berry v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Butcher v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.