Legal Opinion

City Nat. Bank of Fort Smith v. Incorporated Town of Kiowa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1924No. 13329PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

There are 16 assignments of error in the petition in error, but these are reduced to and covered by nine propositions in the brief and argument of plaintiff. As stated by plaintiff at page 37 of its brief:

“The principal questions arising on the record relate to (1) the power of the Town of Kiowa to sell its water and light plant to the Kiowa Ice, Light & Water Company; (2) the right of the latter 'company to mortgage all the property to E. G. Burnley for the purpose of securing said Burnley for the money advanced to said company by said Burnley; (3) the validity of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. In Re Town of AftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. City of Oklahoma City v. HokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Meder v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Newblock v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Thomas v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v. MullinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Protest of ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API