Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 10, 2003PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

836 A.2d 821 (2003)

364 N.J. Super. 387

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Larry L. PETERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 23, 2003.

Decided December 10, 2003.

Vanessa Potkin of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Rutgers University Law School Urban Legal Clinic, attorneys; Ms. Potkin and Marcia Levy, Newark, on the brief).

Kristen M. Harberg, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General, attorney; Ms. Harberg, of counsel and on the brief).

Before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. People v. UriosteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. People v. HockenberryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. People v. RokitaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Powers v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. ReldanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. State v. DeMarcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  4. Peterson v. BernardiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
  5. HAFFEY v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API