State v. Carter
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
In challenging their murder convictions defendants present numerous claims of error. The one that presently engages the Court’s attention focuses on the interpretation and use of a polygraph examination report concerning a prosecution witness. In order that we may have a more complete record presented for our considered deliberation of this issue, we remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings, to be conducted on an expedited basis. We retain jurisdiction to the end that our final decision may be made upon receipt of the trial court’s determination on the questions discussed…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- State v. NashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Romano v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. EngelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Carter v. RaffertyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.