People v. Urioste
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn
The miracle and wonder of DNA forensic technology has assumed an ever-increasing role in our quest for truth and justice. At times, DNA can possess the power to decisively negate other evidence that suggests guilt and virtually establish a person’s innocence.
Because this technology is of relatively recent origin, it was not available for use at a time when many current Illinois inmates, convicted on less infallible evidence, might have employed it to confirm a claim of innocence. In some of those cases, evidence that contains genetic material capable of testing for DNA is still intact.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. FriebergIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. SavoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- People v. RokitaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- People v. KashneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. HendersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- State v. PetersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- People v. FranksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.