Legal Opinion

People v. Urioste

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 21, 2000No. 5-99-0559PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn

The miracle and wonder of DNA forensic technology has assumed an ever-increasing role in our quest for truth and justice. At times, DNA can possess the power to decisively negate other evidence that suggests guilt and virtually establish a person’s innocence.

Because this technology is of relatively recent origin, it was not available for use at a time when many current Illinois inmates, convicted on less infallible evidence, might have employed it to confirm a claim of innocence. In some of those cases, evidence that contains genetic material capable of testing for DNA is still intact.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. FriebergIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. SavoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. People v. RokitaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. People v. KashneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. HendersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. State v. PetersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  4. People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. People v. FranksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API