Legal Opinion

People v. Hockenberry

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 13, 2000No. 2-99-0744PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger

The defendant, Richard E Hockenberry, Sr., appeals from the order of the circuit court of McHenry County denying his motion pursuant to section 116 — 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/116 — 3 (West 1998)) for forensic testing not available at trial.

In 1988, the defendant was charged with aggravated criminal sexual assault of his ex-wife (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 12— 14(a)(2) (now 720 ILCS 5/12 — 14(a)(2) (West 1998))) and home invasion (111. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 12 — 11(a)(2) (now 720 ILCS 5/12 — 11(a)(2) (West 1998))). At trial, the defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. FriebergIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Flores v. DuganIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. SavoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. People v. StevensAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. SavoryIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Village of Mundelein v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. People v. HendersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. People v. TravisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API