Legal Opinion

Gay v. Gay

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 9, 2002No. AC 20755PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

This case presents an issue of first impression before this court. The plaintiff, Joan E. Gay, now known as Joan E. McNulty, appeals from the order of the trial court modifying the alimony award to be paid by the defendant, Thomas J. Gay. The sole issue is whether the trial court improperly considered capital gains realized by the plaintiff to be income when modifying the defendant’s alimony obligation. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for further proceedings.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our consideration of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Bartlett v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gay v. GaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Berry v. BerryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Gay v. GaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Birkhold v. BirkholdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  5. Hunihan v. Hunihan, No. Fa93 030 18 25 S (Feb. 4, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API