Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Spencer

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 6, 2002No. AC 21722PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The plaintiff, Michelle L. Spencer, appeals from the order of the trial court modifying the alimony and child support awards to be paid by the defendant, Edgar B. Spencer III. Each of the plaintiffs claims on appeal centers on whether the comí; improperly found that the loss of the defendant’s employment formed a sufficient basis for modification of the support awards despite a trust fund in which the defendant was, at the time of the dissolution, and continues to be a beneficiary.1 We affirm the order of the trial court.

*477The following facts and procedural history are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Zeoli v. Commissioner of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Crowley v. CrowleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Demartino v. DemartinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Piteau v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. Powell-Ferri v. FerriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Commerce Bank, N.A. v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. Arena v. ArenaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API