Darrell Rittenberry v. Jack Morgan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Darrell Rittenber-ry, who had previously filed a federal ha-beas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and was denied relief, filed the present habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Ritten-berry claims that by filing under section 2241, he does not have to meet the requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), which restricts the filing of successive petitions “under section 2254.” The district court dismissed the petition, but granted a Certificate of Appealability on the single legal question of whether section 2241 “remains an independent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ex Parte YergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Alonzo Cook v. New York State Division of Parole, and New York State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Rice v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Antonelli v. Warden, U.S.P. AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Catanzaro v. HarryDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
- Abernathy v. DealDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Adams 268663 v. HortonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.