Catanzaro v. Harry
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. JONKER, District Judge.
This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. *785The Court has granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134,110 Stat. 1321 (1996), the Court is required to dismiss any prisoner action brought under federal law if the complaint is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915A. The Court must read Plaintiffs pro se complaint…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Allah v. Chambers SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Aniyunwiya v. KalisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Aniyunwiya v. LutzDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Bridges 437651 v. McCauleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
- Bridges 437651 v. Michigan Parole Board MembersDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.