Legal Opinion

John v. Marshall

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1951No. Civ. 14517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J.—

Defendant appeals from a judgment granting declaratory relief under a certain agreement and awarding plaintiffs the sum of $2,901.76.

Questions Presented

1. Is defendant bound by the agreement (a) in view of the fact that it is not signed by all the parties owning property described in it; (b) as defendant is not a party to the agreement ?

2. If the parties are bound by the agreement, was defendant entitled under its terms to turn the water system over to plaintiffs ?

3. Is defendant liable for the amount of water charges found ■ by the court ?

4. Are indispensable parties absent from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Farmer v. Ukiah Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Feary v. Aaron Burglar Alarm, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Cox v. BerryUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Peabody Seating Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Ragan v. SirigoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API