Legal Opinion

Cox v. Berry

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1967No. 10744PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

This action was instituted by Marvin Cox, plaintiff, against J. R. Berry, defendant, to collect $5,000 on a promissory note. The plaintiff’s right to recover on the note is not the question raised on this appeal. Defendant Berry filed a cross-complaint against the respondents, five directors of Zions Investment Corporation, alleging that they had agreed to indemnify him for this note and other debts of that corporation. On the basis of the pleadings, affidavits and exhibits submitted by the parties, the trial court ruled that defendant Berry could show no right to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Snyder v. CluneUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Joseph v. W. H. Groves Latter Day Saints HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Thompson v. Ford Motor CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Continental Bank & Trust Company v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Controlled Receivables, Inc. v. HarmanUtah Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. Parrish v. Terre Haute Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Skinner v. HaugsethDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Curtis v. HannahIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Wiegand v. TringaliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API