Legal Opinion
Kuniyuki v. Acheson
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 24, 1950No. 2560PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
The American born plaintiff seeks in this action a judgment that she is a citizen of the United States.
The first thing to take into consideration is the jurisdiction of the Court. I will now find that under Section 903 of Title 8 U.S.C.A., this Court has jurisdiction to hear and try this case and make a judicial determination as to whether or not the plaintiff in this case was deprived of her citizenship by voting in the elections in Japan according to the evidence in the case.
The Section involved on the merits is 401(e) of the United States Nationality Act, 801(e), Title…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
- Etsuko Arikawa v. AchesonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
- Hatsuye Ouye v. AchesonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 364Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Acheson, Secretary of State of United States v. Mariko KuniyukiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Furusho v. AchesonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1951
- Nieto v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1951
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 364Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996