Legal Opinion
Furusho v. Acheson
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided January 23, 1951No. Civ. No. 967PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Basically, the operative facts in this Nationality Act suit, 8 U.S.C.A. § 903 are of the same nature as those which support the decisions in the several unappealed cases cited in the footnote.1
In other words, this, too, is a case of a girl, a dual citizen (United States and Japan), domiciled in Japan since 1932, voting in elections in Occupied Japan in 1946 and 1947.
Like the courts whose decisions have been cited, this Court is also of the view that these facts did not effect the expatriation of the plaintiff from the United States, for (a) Occupied Japan is not a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dos Reis Ex Rel. Camara v. NicollsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
- Acheson, Secretary of State of United States v. Yee King GeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Etsuko Arikawa v. AchesonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
- Hatsuye Ouye v. AchesonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hichino Uyeno v. AchesonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1951
- Acheson, Secretary of State of United States v. Mariko KuniyukiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Nieto v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1951
- Serizawa v. DullesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Villarreal v. HornDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.