Legal Opinion

Etsuko Arikawa v. Acheson

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 4, 1949No. 7973-WM, 8014-WMPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAH, District Judge.

These two cases were consolidated for trial and the record relates to both of them with the additional contention and testimony presented in the Tsunashima case upon the question of duress, coercion, mistake, influence, and the lack of free exercise of will power and intelligent choice.

The plaintiffs, being citizens of the United States, bring these actions against the Secretary of the United States for a decree adjudging that they are still citizens and nationals of the United States, and are entitled to the rights and privileges of a national of the United States…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Packer Corp. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Doreau v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. Brunell v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tomoya Kawakita v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Hichino Uyeno v. AchesonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1951
  3. MacHado v. McGrath Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. Tomasicchio v. AchesonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1951
  5. Acheson, Secretary of State of United States v. Mariko KuniyukiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API