Frink v. Murphy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third Judicial District. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. '
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.
Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.
This is an application for a mandamus to compel the defendant to execute a conveyance of certain property sold by him as Sheriff, etc. The application is contested upon the ground that the property has been redeemed, and the question is, whether the persons claiming to have redeemed it are redemptioners within the meaning of the statute ? The sale was made under a judgment of foreclosure, and the persons redeeming are assignees of one Kealy, who was a junior mortgage creditor, and a party to the foreclosure suit. The decree of foreclosure ascertained the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Lauriat v. StrattonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1880
- Western Land & Cattle Co. v. National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Eldridge v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- San Jose Water Co. v. LyndonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.