Eldridge v. Wright
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Fourth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Morrison, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Thornton, J.:
Eldridge instituted this action to quiet his title to a parcel of land situate in the City and County of San Francisco.
It appears from the findings of the Court below, that on the 26th of March, 1872, J. 13. and W. H. Fanvell, who were then owners of undivided moieties of the land in controversy, executed a mortgage thereon to the National Gold Bank and Trust Company; that this company thereafter brought suit to foreclose the mortgage, and obtained a decree, which was recorded on the 29th of January, 1875. At the sale made by virtue of this decree, on the 8th of March, 1875,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bagley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Englund v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Whitney v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Fischer v. EslamanIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Montgomery v. TuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Emerson v. Yosemite Gold Mining & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- McNutt v. Nuevo Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Settlemire v. NewsomeOregon Supreme Court · 1882
- Southern California Lumber Co. v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Metcalf v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.