Legal Opinion

San Jose Water Co. v. Lyndon

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1899No. S. F. No. 1301PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. A. S. Kittredge, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court in a mandamus case commenced therein. The purpose of the proceeding was to compel the defendant, as sheriff, to execute a conveyance of certain property sold by him to plaintiff’s assignor under a decree of foreclosure and sale. The court below ordered the mandate to issue as prayed for, and the appellant appeals from the judgment. The appellant contends that the sheriff properly refused to execute the deed because re*519demption from tlic sale had been made by one Herman Levy. This contention cannot be maintained, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Camp v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Black v. GerichtenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Frink v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shipp Corp., Inc. v. CharpillozDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Western Land & Cattle Co. v. National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Burwell & Morford v. Seattle Plumbing Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Kellerv. BoehmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Seattle Medical Center, Inc. v. Cameo Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API