Drummond Coal Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HORNSBY, Chief Justice.
This appeal involves an award of compensation made in a condemnation proceeding. The condemnation itself is unchallenged, but the appellants invite our attention to five issues concerning the amount of compensation awarded. We address only one issue, and set forth only those facts necessary to support our judgment.
In 1963, the State initiated condemnation proceedings in connection with the construction of Interstate Highway 65. The land to be taken was owned by appellant U.S. Pipe and Foundry Company (“U.S. Pipe”); U.S. Pipe, at a time prior to the initiation of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Korf v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Alabama Power Co. v. HerzfeldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Harco Drug, Inc. v. Notsla, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Symms v. Nelson Sand & Gravel, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Smithrock Quarry, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Highway Dept. v. LawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Portersville Bay Oyster Co. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
- Casillas v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2001
- E-Z Serve Convenience Store, Inc. v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Portersville Bay Oyster Co. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.