Legal Opinion
Casillas v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided May 2, 2001No. 00-3170 D/VPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT.
DONALD, District Judge.
Defendant Federal Express Corp. (“FedEx”) moves to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Mark Casillas’s claims arising under the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et. seq. (“Title VII”), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et. seq. (“ADEA”), the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (“LMRA”), and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et. seq. (“ERISA”).…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vaughn v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASS'N, INTERN.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Vaughn v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n InternationalUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2008