Legal Opinion

Harco Drug, Inc. v. Notsla, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 14, 1980No. 78-334, 78-334XPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Tuscaloosa Housing Authority filed application to condemn property owned by Notsla, Inc., and occupied by two leaseholders, Harco Drug, Inc., and Sam Jackson, a sole proprietor. Following a jury trial, the damages were assessed at $240,000. After deducting attorney's fee of $17,500, the Circuit Court allocated the remaining $222,500 as follows:

Notsla, Inc. (Owner) $197,000 Harco Drug (Lessee) 19,500 Sam Jackson (Lessee) 6,000 --------- $222,500

Notsla, the property owner, appeals the award of $6,000 to Sam Jackson, contending Sam Jackson did not have a leasehold interest. Harco Drug, a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. City of Dothan v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Tennessee C. I. & R. R. v. Pratt Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. GuytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Barber v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. Redevelopment Authority of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Utah Department of Transportation v. FPA West Point, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Drummond Coal Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API