United States v. Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
Three commercial fishing associations appeal the district court’s order denying intervention in an action brought by the United States, as trustee for various Indian tribes, against the State of Washington. The United States and the tribes claimed fishing rights to shellfish. We affirm the district court’s ruling that the motions to intervene were untimely.
FACTS
In 1970, the United States, on its own behalf and as trustee for various Washington State (or “State”) Indian tribes, brought an *1502action against the State to enforce fishing rights reserved by the tribes in a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Sierra Club v. Us Environmental Protection Agency, and City of Phoenix, Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Western Watersheds Project v. Deb HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- In Re Hood Ex Rel. State Tobacco LitigationMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. NicholasDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.