Smith v. Marsh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a motion to intervene as of right in a pending federal affirmative action lawsuit was properly denied as untimely.
I
The case underlying the motion to intervene challenges the use of affirmative action in admissions at the University of Washington Law School. Katuria Smith, Angela Rock, and Michael Pyle (“Applicants”) are unsuccessful white applicants who sued the Law School, former dean Wallace D. Loh, and certain other current and former Law School officials (collectively, “the Law School”), seeking to challenge its admission policies. Tyson…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Northwest Forest Resource Council v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Coalition for Economic Equity v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Mark Brown, in His Official Capacity as Director of the State of Washington Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by682 opinions
- Sergio Ramirez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health LabCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Patricia A. Brooks v. City of San Mateo, a Municipal Order and Corporation San Mateo Police Department John Stangl, Chief of Police Steven SelvaggioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ralph E. Thornton Cheryl A. Thornton v. City of St. Helens Warren Baker Brian LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
677 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.