Securities & Exchange Commission v. Nicholas
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING THE USAO’S MOTION TO INTERVENE AND MOTION TO STAY
CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
The United States of America, by and through the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California (the “USAO”), seeks to intervene in this civil enforcement action (the “civil case”) by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against former Broadcom executives Henry T. Nicholas, III, Henry Samueli, William J. Ruehle, and David Dull. 1 Particularly, the USAO moves to intervene in order to stay discovery and other proceedings with respect to Defendants Nicholas and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aspen Financial Services, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Ruszczyk v. NoorDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. AbdallahDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. KanodiaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Telexfree, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.