Legal Opinion
Shinn v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 17, 1939No. 27871PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHhrst, J.
This is an action to enjoin the enforcement of certain ordinances of Oklahoma City. Plaintiff alleged in his petition that he is a money lender; that the ordinances of the defendant regulating this occupation are unconstitutional for many reasons; that the defendant, if not restrained, will enforce the ordinances as against plaintiff, and asked the enforcement of same be enjoined. Defendant’s demurrer to this petition was sustained by the trial court. Plaintiff elected to stand on his petition, and the court then dismissed same with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals.
The ordinances in question…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lehon v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Black v. GeisslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Kelly v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Welch, Ins. Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Ex Parte Keane v. StrodtmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Brown v. State Election Board of the OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Kelleher v. MinshullWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Anderson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- City of Shawnee v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Wolfenbarger v. HennesseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.