Legal Opinion

Cranberry Creek Drainage District v. La Vigne

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1930PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The petition, to which a general demurrer was interposed, challenges the constitutionality of sec. 89.376, Stats., passed in 1927, and which reads:

“89.376 Assessments paid in district securities. Any landowner in a drainage district owning a bond, note or past-due interest coupon of said district, may offer the same to the town or county treasurer in payment of drainage taxes on specified lands in said district, and said town or county treasurer shall accept such bond, note or past-due coupon at its face value, plus accrued interest at the time of presentation in payment of such taxes. Such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Oneida County v. TibbitsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Oshkosh Water Works Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Amy v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Finney v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n of Milwaukee v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Rand v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Rorick v. Board of Com'rs of Everglades Drainage Dist.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1932
  5. Davis v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API