Legal Opinion

In Re Fossil, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided May 19, 2010No. Case 06-cv-1672-FPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

ROYAL FURGESON, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Consolidated Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint (Docket No. 157), filed on December 9, 2009. A hearing in this matter was held on January 19, 2010. Having considered the oral argument, the filings and record, and applicable law the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 157).

I. Background

A. Procedural Background

The original Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint in this case was filed on September 13, 2006, and assigned to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Shenk ex rel. Sirius XM Radio Inc. v. KarmazinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. In Re Danaher Corporation Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API