Legal Opinion

In Re Danaher Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 28, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-2445Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE DANAHER CORPORATION Case No. 1:20-cv-02445-TNM SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE (Consolidated with Case No. 1:20-cv- LITIGATION 02846-TNM) MEMORANDUM OPINION It is black letter law that a board of directors manages a corporation’s affairs. Derivative suits—when shareholders sue on a corporation’s behalf for wrong done to the corporation— therefore impinge on a board’s management prerogatives. The demand requirement balances the interests of directors in managing the corporation and the interests of shareholders in challenging abuses that…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API