Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 20, 2008No. AC 28914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

In this slip and fall case, the plaintiff, Darren Humphrey, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, following a court trial, in favor of the defendant, Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly failed to consider whether the defendant was liable for his injuries under the mode of operation rule subsequently adopted by our Supreme Court in Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc., 281 Conn. 768, 918 A.2d 249 (2007) (en banc). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In October, 2005, the plaintiff commenced the action that underlies…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Cadlerock Properties Joint Venture, L.P. v. Town of AshfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API