Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether this court should adopt the so-called “mode of operation” rule, a rule of premises liability pursuant to which a business invitee who is injured by a dangerous condition on the premises may recover without proof that the business had actual or constructive notice of that condition if the business’ chosen mode of operation creates a foreseeable risk that the condition regu*770larly will occur and the business fails to take reasonable measures to discover and remove it. The named plaintiff,2 Maureen Kelly, commenced this action…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Blair v. West Town MallTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Williams v. United Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Edwards v. Hy-VeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.