Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 3, 2007No. SC 17404PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether this court should adopt the so-called “mode of operation” rule, a rule of premises liability pursuant to which a business invitee who is injured by a dangerous condition on the premises may recover without proof that the business had actual or constructive notice of that condition if the business’ chosen mode of operation creates a foreseeable risk that the condition regu*770larly will occur and the business fails to take reasonable measures to discover and remove it. The named plaintiff,2 Maureen Kelly, commenced this action…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Blair v. West Town MallTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Williams v. United Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
  2. Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Edwards v. Hy-VeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API